CURMUDGUCATION: DeVos Folds

CURMUDGUCATIONThe slightly-cranky voice navigating the world of educational “reform” while trying to still pursue the mission of providing quality education.

Source: CURMUDGUCATION: DeVos Folds

DeVos Folds

It was pretty much zero surprise that the Trump administration chose to undo the Obama protections for transgender students (despite his vociferous campaign assertion that he would be a far better friend to LGBT folks than Clinton).

Thank you to the LGBT community! I will fight for you while Hillary brings in more people that will threaten your freedoms and beliefs.

Yeah, that’s a real Trump tweet.

Only a tiny bit of my soul died this week. Hardly hurts at all.

But no– the actual surprise was that according to several published reports (because, apparently, DC leaks like a buckshot-blasted colander) Betsy DeVos balked at this move. Rescinding the protections required two departments to sign off, and DeVos reportedly did not want to do it. She expressed her concern that transgender students could be more vulnerable to harm without the rue, according to “three Republicans with direct knowledge of the internal discussions.” Attorney General Jess Sessions escalated to Defcon Five. Per the New York Times:

Mr. Sessions, who has opposed expanding gay, lesbian and transgender rights, pushed Ms. DeVos to relent. After getting nowhere, he took his objections to the White House because he could not go forward without her consent. Mr. Trump sided with his attorney general, the Republicans said, and told Ms. DeVos in a meeting in the Oval Office on Tuesday that he wanted her to drop her opposition. And Ms. DeVos, faced with the alternative of resigning or defying the president, agreed to go along.

Soon after, DeVos was toeing the party line and issuing a statement that boiled down to “vulnerable students are vulnerable, and somebody really should look out for them, but it won’t be the federal government.”

The actual policy doesn’t tell us anything about this administration that we didn’t already know. But the way it happened tell us– and perhaps DeVos– a bit about her role in this administration.

First, I was actually a little surprised that DeVos rolled over so easily. I thought she was tougher than this. I thought she was a policy pit bull. But she is also a DC newbie. GQ has called her, more than once, a rube. Now Lord knows, when it comes to the DC political world, I am worse than a rube. But I can’t help thinking this would have been a time for DeVos to read the national room and say, “Do you really want to fire a cabinet official one month in over where transgender kids can pee? Is that the story you want on Saturday Night Live this week?” Still, I’m certain that it’s pretty hard to face down a US President, particularly one who is well-known for gutting enemies and holding long grudges (an approach that DeVos knows something about). Bottom line– she had her first test, and she folded like a cheap lawn chair.

Second, while this was a protection of huge importance to trans kids and anyone who cares about them, and while this makes a huge statement about our compassion or lack thereof for vulnerable students, it was still relatively small potatoes to the Trump administration. It’s not repealing Obamacare or building a wall or any of the marquee promises on which Trump built his brand. And yet he was willing to take DeVos to the wall on this.

Which raises the question– just how much autonomy will DeVos have as Secretary? Will Trump and his boys micromanage her on every single issue? And yes, it’s worth noting in this administration that along with a lack of administrative experience and management background and any time at all working in government, the other thing that Betsy DeVos lacks is a penis, which in any administration should make zero difference– but in a Trump administration? I have to wonder if DeVos went home yesterday and sat thinking, “Why the hell did I even take this job? Have I made a huge mistake?”

Third, I told you so. And not just me. Regardless of how you feel about her actual preferred education policies, DeVos was always unqualified by her sheer lack of any experience that would have prepared to run a cabinet-level department while going head to head with other major players in the federal government.

It’s possible we’ve been worrying too much about DeVos’s beliefs and policy goals because her voice simply isn’t going to matter in this administration. Maybe she’ll find herself a crash course in How To Be An Effective Cabinet Secretary, or maybe she’ll just sit in her office, holding a rubber stamp and waiting for Fearless Leader to tell her what policy she’s supporting this week. We’ll just have to wait and see if the story, or DeVos, will unfold.

2017-18 School Calendar

2017-18 School Calendar
by David Britten
Kent County ISD, which includes 19 other school districts besides ours, requested and received approval to begin the school year prior to Labor Day. Many of you may recall that every school district in Michigan did so prior to 2008.

The reason for the waiver to begin prior to Labor Day is based on what our county believes is best for our students. There are a number of valid reasons for the change back to this earlier start date including alignment with local colleges that provide our students with early college and dual enrollment opportunities. We also believe that this is the beginning of a longer process of adopting a more balanced “year-round” calendar which would provide a shorter summer break and other breaks during the school year. One thing to remember, however, is that no matter how the calendar is structured, we are required by law to provide 180 days of school that include a minimum of 1,098 hours of scheduled instruction. This is true for all Michigan public and charter schools.

READ MORE HERE – https://rebel6.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/2017-18-school-calendar/

Superintendent's Notes

Kent County ISD, which includes 19 other school districts besides ours, requested and received approval to begin the school year prior to Labor Day. Many of you may recall that every school district in Michigan did so prior to 2008.

The reason for the waiver to begin prior to Labor Day is based on what our county believes is best for our students. There are a number of valid reasons for the change back to this earlier start date including alignment with local colleges that provide our students with early college and dual enrollment opportunities. We also believe that this is the beginning of a longer process of adopting a more balanced “year-round” calendar which would provide a shorter summer break and other breaks during the school year. One thing to remember, however, is that no matter how the calendar is structured, we are required by law to provide 180 days…

View original post 458 more words

Trump Administration Rescinds Transgender-Student Guidance – Rules for Engagement – Education Week

The U.S. departments of Justice and Education rescinded Obama-era guidance on the rights of transgender students, lifting requirements that schools allow students to use the restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity.

Trump Administration Rescinds Transgender-Student Guidance
The U.S. departments of Justice and Education rescinded Obama-era guidance on the rights of transgender students, lifting requirements that schools allow students to use the restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identity.

Read more: Trump Administration Rescinds Transgender-Student Guidance – Rules for Engagement – Education Week

Republican voters, your voices could save the Affordable Care Act | Eclectablog

Amy Lynn Smith has posted a new item, ‘Republican voters, your voices could save
the Affordable Care Act’, at Eclectablog

You may view the latest post at
http://www.eclectablog.com/2017/02/republican-voters-your-voices-could-save-the-affordable-care-act.html

Source: Republican voters, your voices could save the Affordable Care Act | Eclectablog

Emails show EPA chief Scott Pruitt has close ties to fossil fuel industry – CBS News

The Senate confirmed Scott Pruitt as EPA administrator on Friday. More than 7,500 pages were released under court order after an Oklahoma judge ruled that Pruitt had been illegally withholding his correspondence, which is public record under state law, for the last two years. 

Source: Emails show EPA chief Scott Pruitt has close ties to fossil fuel industry – CBS News

Trump admin refuses to provide Title IX protections to transgender students, Betsy DeVos falls in line to save her job | Eclectablog

‘Trump admin refuses to provide Title IX protections to transgender students, Betsy DeVos falls in line to save her job’

You may view the latest post at
http://www.eclectablog.com/2017/02/trump-admin-refuses-to-provide-title-ix-protections-to-transgender-students-betsy-devos-falls-in-line-to-save-her-job.html

Source: Trump admin refuses to provide Title IX protections to transgender students, Betsy DeVos falls in line to save her job | Eclectablog

Center for American Progress Receives NEPC’s 2016 Bunkum Award for Shoddy Research | National Education Policy Center

BOULDER, CO (February 23, 2017) – The 89th Academy Awards will be celebrated this weekend, which means it’s also time to announce the winner of the 2016 National Education Policy Center Bunkum Award. We invite you to enjoy our 11th annual tongue-in-cheek salute to the most egregiously shoddy think tank report reviewed in 2016.

This year’s Bunkum winner is the Center for American Progress (CAP), for its report, Lessons From State Performance on NAEP: Why Some High-Poverty Students Score Better Than Others.

The CAP report is based on a correlational study with the key finding that high standards increase learning for high-poverty students. The researchers compared changes in states’ test scores for low-income students to changes to those states’ standards-based policy measures as judged by the researchers. Their conclusions were that high standards lead to higher test scores and that states should adopt and implement the Common Core.

Alas, there was much less than met the eye.

In choosing the worst from among the many “worthy” contenders competing for the Bunkum Award, our judges applied evaluation criteria from two guidelines for how to understand research, Five Simple Steps to Reading Research and Reading Qualitative Educational Policy Research.

Here’s how the CAP report scored:

  • Was the design appropriate?
    No: The design was not sensitive, so they tossed in “anecdotes” and “impressions.”
  • Were the methods clearly explained?
    No: The methods section is incomplete and obtuse.
  • Were the data sources appropriate?
    No: The variables used were inadequate and were aggregated in unclear ways.
  • Were the data gathered of sufficient quality and quantity?
    No: The report uses just state-level NAEP scores and summary data.
  • Were the statistical analyses appropriate?
    No: A multiple correlation with just 50 cases is too small.
  • Were the analyses properly executed?
    Cannot be determined: The full results were not presented.
  • Was the literature review thorough and unbiased?
    No: The report largely neglected peer-reviewed research.
  • Were the effect sizes strong enough to be meaningful?
    Effect sizes were not presented, and the claims are based on the generally unacceptable 0.10 significance level.
  • Were the recommendations supported by strong evidence?
    No: Their conclusion is based on weak correlations.

The fundamental flaw in this report is simply that it uses inadequate data and analyses to make a broad policy recommendation in support of the Common Core State Standards. A reader may or may not agree with the authors’ conclusion that “states should continue their commitment to the Common Core’s full implementation and aligned assessments.” But that conclusion cannot and should not be based on the flimsy analyses and anecdotes presented in the report.

Watch the 2016 Bunkum Award video presentation, read the Bunkum-worthy report and the review, and learn about past Bunkum winners and the National Education Policy Center’s Think Twice Think Tank Review project: http://nepc.colorado.edu/think-tank/bunkum-awards/2016
About the Think Twice Think Tank Review Project:

Many organizations publish reports they call research – but are they? These reports often are published without having first been reviewed by independent experts – the “peer review” process commonly used for academic research.

Even worse, many think tank reports subordinate research to the goal of making arguments for policies that reflect the ideology of the sponsoring organization.

Yet, while they may provide little or no value as research, advocacy reports can be very effective for a different purpose: they can influence policy because they are often aggressively promoted to the media and policymakers.

To help the public determine which elements of think tank reports are based on sound social science, NEPC’s “Think Twice” Think Tank Review Project has, every year since 2006, asked independent experts to assess strengths and weaknesses of reports published by think tanks.

Few of the think tank reports have been found by experts to be sound and useful; most, however, are found to have little, if any, scientific merit. At the end of each year NEPC editors sift through the reviewed reports to identify the worst offender. We then award the organization publishing that report NEPC’s Bunkum Award for shoddy research.

The National Education Policy Center (NEPC) Think Twice Think Tank Review Project (http://thinktankreview.org) provides the public, policymakers, and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected publications. The project is made possible in part by support provided by the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice: http://www.greatlakescenter.org

The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), housed at the University of Colorado Boulder School of Education, produces and disseminates high-quality, peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions. Visit us at: http://nepc.colorado.edu

States’ Rights and Wrongs – Have You Heard

Source: States’ Rights and Wrongs – Have You Heard

The rollback of civil rights enforcement in education is underway, says law professor Derek Black…

Jennifer Berkshire: The Trump Administration has just rescinded guidelines to schools banning discrimination against transgender students. There’s a lot of speculation about just how *joint* the joint letter from Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and Attorney General Jeff Sessions actually was. But you seem unconvinced by the portrayals of DeVos as a fierce protector of civil rights.

Image result for transgender bathroomDerek Black: The stream of bad news over the past few months has been steady. The Trump transition team said the administration would scale back the civil rights work in education.  At her confirmation hearing, Betsy DeVos was reluctant to take an affirmative stance on enforcing students’ disability rights.  Since taking the post, she has remarked that she could not *think of any* current pressing civil rights issues where the federal government has a role to play; things like racial segregation and exclusion of females were things of the past in her opinion.

Now reports are coming out that Gail Heriot is likely to be the next head of the Department’s Office for Civil Rights. Heroit has been critical of the Office’s aggressive civil rights stance in recent years. With these individuals in place, it is hard to imagine much good happening at the federal level. Even if they do not rescind other Department positions on integration, school discipline, English Language Learners, and school resources, they are very unlikely to enforce existing regulations and policy guidance. Disparate impact enforcement, for instance, will be non-existent.  Rather than take on traditional civil rights concerns, I would expect they will identify fringe issues to pursue. 

Berkshire: OK—forget about *much good happening at the federal level.* Is there anything we can feel hopeful about? That was only the first question of our interview and I’m not sure how much more of this I can take…

Black: We have been here before. Disparate impact was not enforced during the Bush era either.  And it focused on more marginal issues like Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act. I think we are actually in a better place to weather the storm today than we were last time.  The school-to-prison pipeline is a household word now. More districts are voluntarily pursuing integration.  California is bringing back bilingual education.  And parents are fed up with standardized testing.  On a host of issues, there are local advocates and local politicians that are going to do the right thing regardless of what the Department of Education does.  No doubt about it, there is a storm coming, but there are a lot of hardworking and committed people on the ground.

Image resultBerkshire: You’re the author of a book called Ending Zero Tolerance: The Crisis of Absolute School Discipline that is turning out to be alarmingly prescient.

Black: One of the central premises of the book is that when nobody else will stand up for kids, it has to be the courts. There are numerous systemic instances over the past few decades where schools and states have gone too far. And when they do it is only the courts that are the saving grace, because we have good political times and bad political times, as we are seeing.

READ THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW HERE: 

http://haveyouheardblog.com/states-rights-and-wrongs/

 

About Jennifer Berkshire…

You find yourself at the blog of freelance journalist and public education advocate Jennifer Berkshire. Berkshire spent six years editing a newspaper for the American Federation of Teachers in Massachusetts and now (almost) makes her living writing, editing and causing trouble. She started a blog called EduShyster about education and matters related 2012 after her frequent early morning tirades against the state of media coverage of education issues threatened to upend her marriage. What began as a comic skewering of the excesses of the education reform movement has morphed into something more serious—but always with a focus on the unintended consequences of the shift towards a market-based education system. In 2016, she launched the podcast, Have You Heard, a monthly series that hands the mic to voices and perspectives that have largely been missing from the debate over the future of our public schools. Have You Heard recently wrapped up its inaugural season and has kicked off season 2.0: a talk-show on hot-button education issues with education scholar and all around smarty Jack Schneider.

Berkshire’s writing and interviews regularly gain national attention. Her work has appeared in the Washington Post, the Baffler, Salon, Alternet, the Progressive, Bloomberg EDU and some other places she is almost certainly forgetting.

For more information or to invite her to come for a visit, contact jenniferberkshire@gmail.com

###

House Republicans crash and burn in attempt to decimate state budget with tax cut | Eclectablog

Eclectablog

‘House Republicans crash and burn in attempt
to decimate state budget with tax cut’, at Eclectablog

You may view the latest post at
http://www.eclectablog.com/2017/02/house-republicans-crash-and-burn-in-attempt-to-decimate-state-budget-with-tax-cut.html

Source: House Republicans crash and burn in attempt to decimate state budget with tax cut | Eclectablog