Last week I was following a few Facebook strands. As I often do, when I find a quote that sparks me to think, I like to repost it to my Facebook page. Typically I get a decent amount of “likes” with the occasional comment. However, when I took Alison Hawyer McDowell’s quote below I had no idea of what would follow.
Take a read and then keep the conversation going. Is Alison right? Without a revolution is the teaching profession doomed?
[I]f people don’t rise up en masse there likely will not be a teaching profession as we traditionally think of it in 5-7 years. Alison Hawver McDowell
Who do you want to have rise up en masse?
The 88.95% of of the population that send their children to public schools and all the employees that work at those schools and all the pointy headed academics (like me and you) that think we will get a pass when public schools are dismantled.
We really need everyone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N54qNTeBOek
If you have more time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvqBJYmpQrY
Lots more here: https://wrenchinthegears.com/
I believe this to be true
This is where we are headed if people don’t speak up. There really isn’t that much time. Much of the infrastructure to make this transition happen is already in place. http://www.knowledgeworks.org/…/future-ed-workforce…
I am busy mapping Nellie Mae grants all over New England. This threat is very real. “Personalized” learning is not what people think. Tim Slekar
-You’re in WI, right? What’s the deal with the CESU-1 Innovative Learning Program? It’s right near Waukesha where Walker made his “let’s end seat time” speach the other day, right?
But how do you reach them (us) all? Most parents don’t understand what is going on until it is too late. They put up with a lot of bs because their kid is happy and seems to be doing well. They may not even go to PTA meetings. Come to think of it, the PTA is mostly about bake sales, and mickey mouse stuff. Why would anyone go to a PTA meeting? School Board members sometimes get it, but the rest of the public? Not so much.
I don’t know. Some think it’s already over. I haven’t gotten there yet, but I’m not hopeful.
The reformers have pushed out veteran teachers and brought in so many new ones that only know teaching via data dashboard. Plus they are providing incentives and fellowships for “teacher leaders” to be trained in these systems and bring them back to their districts. That is what happened in RI. Nellie Mae has different categories of grants. Convince the public; convince/train the teachers, convince the students, get into the districts, create the new system, acquire the back up research to support it all. They are darn thorough.
Alison Hawver McDowell
That they are.. Google has pretty much run of the roost here in the DOE.
I’ve shared the info to many here in FL.its not getting through. We need more prominent people to speak out. The heads of education colleges and universities would help. Pediatricians must be out in the media speaking out, not just publishing in journals. We need face time from these people. My word means little. When I hear a parent say, I don’t want my kid to feel left out or different. I don’t want my kid tested badly by teachers or admin by refusing iReady, then I know I’m getting nowhere with that parent.
If the Teachers in the PTA would use it to advocate it will change the organization. A teacher is leading the national now. We need a parent leading and teachers supporting those parents not leading.
The PTA is pushing CCSS. They need CCSS to push the digitization of education. That was the whole point.
But we all must be willing to work on our local organizations. Change will not come from the top until it changes.
Very few people realize the end game. That is the problem. People are being intentionally distracted and organizing around the wrong things; things that won’t actually stop this digital / learning ecosystem transition. That is why I am so frustrated.
THIS is what it’s all about: https://www.c-span.org/video/…
Do you know why parents don’t get it? And why people aren’t “rising up”. That may be the most important question to ask.
·My answer: Not sure but it seems to me that this whole thing is about “look at what my kid can do on a computer” which was so unlike what the parents and grandparents could do. It became an easy sell to those in the wings to bring it in to schools. Add a bit of teacher/union bashing and it was/is the perfect environment. imho
“personalization” “individual pathways” so much American exceptionalism, everyone at the center of their own universe
·Alison Hawver McDowell
and the connections between the systems and these pathways have become so clouded with so much intermingling that itʻs hard to tell who is the wolf leading the sheep.
If you’re desperately trying to open a door and you keep putting the key on the lock but it doesn’t work, or you try to bash it in but it doesn’t break, at a certain point in time you have to say to yourself, this isn’t going to work. Time is running out and you have to try something different
And….that’s why some are saying it’s over. Give up, wait for the destruction, and plan on building a new version of education. But that will entail the end of the teaching profession. And some might be able to carve out intentional communities of progressive, humane educational practice but that’s not what most kids are going to get. It’s just not. And are we going to make that sacrifice? And if we head that way are we that much different from Vander Ark and DeVos? This is something I’m really struggling with right now.
No one is saying give up…. the message, the information, the vision, the concept the fight, is right..!!!! the question is, how do you get people to focus, to wake up, to take an active part? I dont have the answer. All i know is that the key isnt working, and the door is barred shut, we have to go around the back or through the window or down the damn chimney if need be. Giving up, is not an option.
Parents don’t “get it” because they trust the system. They trust that what is happening in our schools is best for their children because “why would anyone do something harmful to my kids?” They just don’t believe us “crazy” folks out here telling them otherwise. They also don’t research anything on their own or take ownership in the process.
And most don’t really know good teaching. The movements many are for have to do only with ending testing._______________________________________________________________
Tim, the district my kids attend showed a video with a big shot personalized learning guru from Wisconsin. I tried to find the video so I could see if you knew of him.
Since talking to you yesterday, Alison Hawver McDowell
. I have some ideas on potential messaging
There a lot being incubated in WI. I spoke with a state school board member in AL and they outsourced PD training on CCSS to a different CESU in WI. Weird. This is all linked.
I’ll take a risk and share some ideas….I think we go on the offensive and state exactly what this quote is. Our schools….and our profession is done. And that’s where we start…
And I think when people don’t understand or are indifferent we just let them know matter of factly is the deal. No more do we say “our tin foil hats”. We lead with stories. I heard the spiel on personalized learning and it sounds pretty good. However, what they are saying it is and what I’m seeing are not the same. We need teachers to start striking back with actual researched best practice and I think we start with the work of Nancy atwell since she won that huge award
We just need to be wary of anything that will draw us into metric-based “accountability.” Because it is the “success” “growth” “evidence-based policy” that will ties us into that global financial system. That must be avoided at all costs. We should not be financializing children.
So they sell personalized learning and yet measure according to standards or targets….metric based growth is what I’d call it. The two technically contradict each other.
I think to them data and metrics are “personal.” Therein lies the problem.
How does Google Classroom fit in with all of this?
In the long run we are accepting surveillance in exchange for “free” convenience. Plus we have been building Google’s datasets for years so they are far ahead in AI advancements-all via running their algorithms against our data. Check out Evgeny Morozov’s work: https://www.hkw.de/en/app/mediathek/video/50670
So we have been helping them create the programs that will replace our jobs?
At first I was just worried about student data privacy since in Philly the student email account addresses (managed by google) are their student ID numbers. But it’s much bigger than that.
What is the alternative? Are you suggesting a return to pen and paper?
All of our staff and students have google accounts too.
Yup. Like I said. All of the infrastructure rolled in right under our noses and we didn’t ever have a clue about where things were ultimately headed.
There are serious concerns about wifi-health impacts screen time. I think we need to roll back on the 1:1 programs. Moderate use of tech. Maybe put it back in media centers. And honestly much of this has no place in younger grades.
How can we even stop this?
It seems like PARCC and CCSS were intentional red herrings
One day at a time. One conversation at a time. A friend invited me to Seattle. I gave a talk in the local library and another online friend arranged to have the video made. It’s been watch over 2,000 times in the past few weeks. That’s more than I ever dreamed of. Now maybe a lot of them are Vander Ark’s cronies looking for a way to shut me up. But you never know the ripple effect a few people can have.
I gave it 10 but that is very generous.
We did rise up – together – in 2011. I don’t understand why I have never been consulted about how we did it. I was the secretary and everyone knows that “the” secretary is the one central to the workings of any organizing…..I’m not blowing my own horn here, just speakin’ the truth…I’m not saying that others may have done more visible work, I’m just saying that organizing is like herding cats… But, the group was sabotaged; I was targeted ….The conference went on without a secretary and the work was somewhat lost. … I still have all my notes and have offered them to a few others over the years….no takers…..I boxed them up and put them in the basement….But I highly recommend we re-group and accept the fact that there will be those within the group hoping we don’t succeed — and we act accordingly…ie. build trust within, make and stick to a plan. http://thecrucialvoice.com/…/11/21/s-o-s-why-we-organized/
We had success in our sights. Once we got serious about organizing, we put in a full year of our lives for that one gathering…….but what was more important was the national network we had developed and should have been able to keep going. —–Divided we fell.
I think opt out is an organizing point, not an end in itself. its a willing audience that has been mobilizing. But many people are not there yet. its a process.
This is a FL educator.
You parents need to fight back with some pointed questions whose answers would make your case. Plus, recognize and call out propaganda. This teacher is using an artificial dichotomy —- just like was done with Common Core and high-stakes testing (all or none are the only two choices). I just updated this blog http://wp.me/p2I0Ww-h1
with a quick reference to a list of propaganda techniques. Hope this helps in the battles to come.
This time we cannot afford infighting. The stakes are too high. Solidarity in support of public education, unionized teachers, and teacher education that is based on principles of equity (not just techniques and strategies) must be the ONLY priority. Yes we are human and flawed. But we can’t give in to it. Not now.
I’d suggest listing the deans by geographic regions in the US to make it easier for parent and citizen organizers to reach out to those closest to them to build regional coalitions.
Unfortunately, Ruth Powers
it was just infighting (there really wasn’t much of that in the original SOS organizing committee). It was having a movement be taken over and controlled by organizations. It was a political power play that resulted in diverting the movement to follow leaders that then betrayed the movements original focus…..It wasn’t simple infighting. It was much more destructive than that.
Is there an example of a great sustained movement where power and greed didn’t supplant the original intentions?
The American Revolution – one of the few successful revolutions.
that may be revisionist history…. we’re living in it and if you think this is the first time its been dominated by money and special interests you’d be wrong
I keyed in on the words “original intentions.” I think they succeeded. A movement was sustained that gave birth to our sovereign nation. After that, I think becoming a republic was a wise decision. Have we allowed corruption to get out of hand periodically? You bet. And getting back to our foundation might very well be what sets this mess right.
I only wonder what teachers and administrators are afraid of. The schools that are testing high are not concerned about the rest. That is the biggest obstacle. Until they realize what happens to one school and one child we cannot defeat this attack on public education.
Not all teachers and administrators. It requires courage to put your job on the line, but many are doing it. We need to build on those.