Petrilli’s basic argument is that grades are high and BS Test scores are low, therefor the grades must be inflated. There are several problems with his assumptions here.
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 06:08 AM PDT
Mike Petrilli (Fordham) is concerned about grade inflation.
His concern, as expressed in a recent piece at Education Next, is hung on the hook of a recent-ish survey by Learning Heroes , a new group sponsored by the same old folks (Gates Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Helmsley) that has partnered with some other outfits funded by the same people, like Great Schools (funded by Gates, Bloomberg, Helmsley, Walton) to help sell the notion that Big Standardized Testing is Really Important and we should care about it.
The Learning Heroes survey found that 90 percent of parents believe their child is performing at grade level or better. As you might expect, I don’t put a lot of stock in what Learning Heroes have to say, but I can believe that their finding on this point is not far off the mark. Setting aside the construct of “grade level” (as Petrilli also does), I’m not sure that this finding doesn’t say more about parental love than parental academic acumen. Sometimes we lose sight of how a poll actually works, but I ask you to imagine for a minute– a stranger calls you on the phone and asks you to say how smart and accomplished your child is. What do you say? “Yeah, my kids kind of slow and behind,” probably isn’t it.
But for Petrilli, this feeds into a narrative that reformsters have been pushing for over a decade– the public schools are lying to parents about what is being accomplished.
Providing a more honest assessment of student performance was one of the goals of the Common Core initiative and the new tests created by states that are meant to align to the new, higher standards.
That’s Petrilli’s polite way of putting it. Arne Duncan, you will recall, said that white suburban moms were going to be upset to find out their kids weren’t as smart as they thought. At one point reformsters were trying to sell us the Honesty Gap , a method of crunching numbers to determine just how much your state education system was lying to you. This has been the recurring narrative– your teachers, your schools, even your state, has been lying to you about how well your kids are doing, and only federally crafted standards backed up by Big Standardized Tests can tell you the truth.
Pertrilli is no dope; he understands the challenge here for testing industry salespersons
Conscientious parents are constantly getting feedback about the academic performance of their children, almost all of it from teachers. We see worksheets and papers marked up on a daily or weekly basis; we receive report cards every quarter; and of course there’s the annual (or, if we’re lucky, semiannual) parent-teacher conference. If the message from most of these data points is “your kid is doing fine!” then it’s going to be tough for a single “score report” from a distant state test administered months earlier to convince us otherwise. After all, who knows my kid better: his or her teacher, or a faceless test provider?
He dismisses the old test reports as impenetrably complex, and touts instead the new, improved PARCC reports, which a transparent in the sense that one can clearly see that they provide next to zero useful information. But Petrilli argues that these reports soft-pedal the real results, and that we should look sixth graders in the eye and give them the cold hard truth. Nobody, he says, wants to incite a riot and “tell parents to grab a pitchfork and march down to their school demanding an explanation for lofty-yet-false grades their kids have gotten for years on end,” but on the other hand, he says, “maybe they should.”
This is the new pitch. Grade inflation. Petrilli has been asking folks to chime in with a possible solution to the grade inflation problem. My response, when asked, is that first I have to be convinced it exists.
Petrilli’s basic argument is that grades are high and BS Test scores are low, therefor the grades must be inflated. There are several problems with his assumptions here… -> Source: CURMUDGUCATION: Grade Inflation?